Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract

Kath Checkland (Lead / Corresponding author), Stephen Harrison, Ruth McDonald, Suzanne Grant, Stephen Campbell, Bruce Guthrie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    84 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In 2004 a new contract was introduced for General Practitioners in the UK, which introduced a significant element of 'pay-for-performance', including both clinical and organisational targets. The introduction of this contract has caused interest across the world, particularly amongst those responsible for commissioning primary care services. It can be argued that the clinical targets in the contract (known as the Quality and Outcomes Framework, QOF) represent a move towards a more biomedical model of health and illness, which is contrary to the ideal of providing holistic (or biopsychosocial) care that has been traditionally espoused by GPs. This paper reports results from two linked studies (in England and Scotland) investigating the early stages of the new contract. We describe the way in which four practices with different organisational approaches and espoused identities have all changed their practice structures, consultations and clinical care in response to QOF in ways which will result in patients receiving a more biomedical type of care. In spite of these observed changes, respondents continued to maintain discursive claims to holism. We discuss how this disconnection between rhetoric and reality can be maintained, and consider its implications for the future development of GPs' claims to a professional identity.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)788-803
    Number of pages16
    JournalSociology of Health & Illness
    Volume30
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008

    Keywords

    • general practice
    • holism
    • biopsychosocial medicine
    • quality and outcomes framework
    • OCCUPATIONAL BOUNDARY
    • FINANCIAL INCENTIVES
    • INTERNAL MOTIVATION
    • QUALITY
    • CARE
    • DEFINITION
    • COMPLEXITY
    • SCIENCE
    • CHAOS
    • MODEL

    Cite this

    Checkland, Kath ; Harrison, Stephen ; McDonald, Ruth ; Grant, Suzanne ; Campbell, Stephen ; Guthrie, Bruce. / Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract. In: Sociology of Health & Illness. 2008 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 788-803.
    @article{c52730db66db46ef9b392764a81fb9d1,
    title = "Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract",
    abstract = "In 2004 a new contract was introduced for General Practitioners in the UK, which introduced a significant element of 'pay-for-performance', including both clinical and organisational targets. The introduction of this contract has caused interest across the world, particularly amongst those responsible for commissioning primary care services. It can be argued that the clinical targets in the contract (known as the Quality and Outcomes Framework, QOF) represent a move towards a more biomedical model of health and illness, which is contrary to the ideal of providing holistic (or biopsychosocial) care that has been traditionally espoused by GPs. This paper reports results from two linked studies (in England and Scotland) investigating the early stages of the new contract. We describe the way in which four practices with different organisational approaches and espoused identities have all changed their practice structures, consultations and clinical care in response to QOF in ways which will result in patients receiving a more biomedical type of care. In spite of these observed changes, respondents continued to maintain discursive claims to holism. We discuss how this disconnection between rhetoric and reality can be maintained, and consider its implications for the future development of GPs' claims to a professional identity.",
    keywords = "general practice, holism, biopsychosocial medicine, quality and outcomes framework, OCCUPATIONAL BOUNDARY, FINANCIAL INCENTIVES, INTERNAL MOTIVATION, QUALITY, CARE, DEFINITION, COMPLEXITY, SCIENCE, CHAOS, MODEL",
    author = "Kath Checkland and Stephen Harrison and Ruth McDonald and Suzanne Grant and Stephen Campbell and Bruce Guthrie",
    year = "2008",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01081.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "788--803",
    journal = "Sociology of Health & Illness",
    issn = "0141-9889",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "5",

    }

    Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract. / Checkland, Kath (Lead / Corresponding author); Harrison, Stephen; McDonald, Ruth; Grant, Suzanne; Campbell, Stephen; Guthrie, Bruce.

    In: Sociology of Health & Illness, Vol. 30, No. 5, 07.2008, p. 788-803.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract

    AU - Checkland, Kath

    AU - Harrison, Stephen

    AU - McDonald, Ruth

    AU - Grant, Suzanne

    AU - Campbell, Stephen

    AU - Guthrie, Bruce

    PY - 2008/7

    Y1 - 2008/7

    N2 - In 2004 a new contract was introduced for General Practitioners in the UK, which introduced a significant element of 'pay-for-performance', including both clinical and organisational targets. The introduction of this contract has caused interest across the world, particularly amongst those responsible for commissioning primary care services. It can be argued that the clinical targets in the contract (known as the Quality and Outcomes Framework, QOF) represent a move towards a more biomedical model of health and illness, which is contrary to the ideal of providing holistic (or biopsychosocial) care that has been traditionally espoused by GPs. This paper reports results from two linked studies (in England and Scotland) investigating the early stages of the new contract. We describe the way in which four practices with different organisational approaches and espoused identities have all changed their practice structures, consultations and clinical care in response to QOF in ways which will result in patients receiving a more biomedical type of care. In spite of these observed changes, respondents continued to maintain discursive claims to holism. We discuss how this disconnection between rhetoric and reality can be maintained, and consider its implications for the future development of GPs' claims to a professional identity.

    AB - In 2004 a new contract was introduced for General Practitioners in the UK, which introduced a significant element of 'pay-for-performance', including both clinical and organisational targets. The introduction of this contract has caused interest across the world, particularly amongst those responsible for commissioning primary care services. It can be argued that the clinical targets in the contract (known as the Quality and Outcomes Framework, QOF) represent a move towards a more biomedical model of health and illness, which is contrary to the ideal of providing holistic (or biopsychosocial) care that has been traditionally espoused by GPs. This paper reports results from two linked studies (in England and Scotland) investigating the early stages of the new contract. We describe the way in which four practices with different organisational approaches and espoused identities have all changed their practice structures, consultations and clinical care in response to QOF in ways which will result in patients receiving a more biomedical type of care. In spite of these observed changes, respondents continued to maintain discursive claims to holism. We discuss how this disconnection between rhetoric and reality can be maintained, and consider its implications for the future development of GPs' claims to a professional identity.

    KW - general practice

    KW - holism

    KW - biopsychosocial medicine

    KW - quality and outcomes framework

    KW - OCCUPATIONAL BOUNDARY

    KW - FINANCIAL INCENTIVES

    KW - INTERNAL MOTIVATION

    KW - QUALITY

    KW - CARE

    KW - DEFINITION

    KW - COMPLEXITY

    KW - SCIENCE

    KW - CHAOS

    KW - MODEL

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01081.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01081.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 788

    EP - 803

    JO - Sociology of Health & Illness

    JF - Sociology of Health & Illness

    SN - 0141-9889

    IS - 5

    ER -