Comparison of particle packing models for proportioning concrete constituents for minimum voids ratio

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    57 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper reports the findings of a study of four particle packing models used to proportion the mix constituents (solid particles) of concrete to produce a minimum voids ratio (or maximum packing density). The models have been compared using laboratory tests and published data. The basic mathematics of the models is discussed, particularly how each model defines the particle size distribution of the solid particles. The models have been applied to both the aggregate (sand and gravel) and the cement phase (PC, PFA, GGBS and limestone fines) and the estimated voids ratio compared with that measured in the laboratory. It was found that the models give broadly the same output and suggest similar combinations of materials to give the minimum voids ratio. Using the materials considered it was found that the largest improvement in voids ratio was achieved with the aggregate phase. The particle sizes of the cements considered here were similar and, as a result, only small improvements in voids ratio could be achieved. It was noted that proportioning concrete mix constituents to minimise voids ratio did tend to produce a harsher mix than normal. However, using the mix suitability factor, proposed by Day (1999), reduced this problem. There are some detail differences between the models suggesting further refinements could be carried out and a modification to one of the models is provided.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)301-309
    Number of pages9
    JournalMaterials and Structures
    Volume35
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    Concretes
    Cements
    Concrete mixtures
    Gravel
    Limestone
    Particle size analysis
    Particles (particulate matter)
    Sand
    Particle size

    Cite this

    @article{ebc9a3ec056b484e9eb450348df2fd9d,
    title = "Comparison of particle packing models for proportioning concrete constituents for minimum voids ratio",
    abstract = "This paper reports the findings of a study of four particle packing models used to proportion the mix constituents (solid particles) of concrete to produce a minimum voids ratio (or maximum packing density). The models have been compared using laboratory tests and published data. The basic mathematics of the models is discussed, particularly how each model defines the particle size distribution of the solid particles. The models have been applied to both the aggregate (sand and gravel) and the cement phase (PC, PFA, GGBS and limestone fines) and the estimated voids ratio compared with that measured in the laboratory. It was found that the models give broadly the same output and suggest similar combinations of materials to give the minimum voids ratio. Using the materials considered it was found that the largest improvement in voids ratio was achieved with the aggregate phase. The particle sizes of the cements considered here were similar and, as a result, only small improvements in voids ratio could be achieved. It was noted that proportioning concrete mix constituents to minimise voids ratio did tend to produce a harsher mix than normal. However, using the mix suitability factor, proposed by Day (1999), reduced this problem. There are some detail differences between the models suggesting further refinements could be carried out and a modification to one of the models is provided.",
    author = "Jones, {M. R.} and L. Zheng and Newlands, {M. D.}",
    note = "dc.publisher: Springer",
    year = "2002",
    doi = "10.1007/BF02482136",
    language = "English",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "301--309",
    journal = "Materials and Structures",
    issn = "1359-5997",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparison of particle packing models for proportioning concrete constituents for minimum voids ratio

    AU - Jones, M. R.

    AU - Zheng, L.

    AU - Newlands, M. D.

    N1 - dc.publisher: Springer

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - This paper reports the findings of a study of four particle packing models used to proportion the mix constituents (solid particles) of concrete to produce a minimum voids ratio (or maximum packing density). The models have been compared using laboratory tests and published data. The basic mathematics of the models is discussed, particularly how each model defines the particle size distribution of the solid particles. The models have been applied to both the aggregate (sand and gravel) and the cement phase (PC, PFA, GGBS and limestone fines) and the estimated voids ratio compared with that measured in the laboratory. It was found that the models give broadly the same output and suggest similar combinations of materials to give the minimum voids ratio. Using the materials considered it was found that the largest improvement in voids ratio was achieved with the aggregate phase. The particle sizes of the cements considered here were similar and, as a result, only small improvements in voids ratio could be achieved. It was noted that proportioning concrete mix constituents to minimise voids ratio did tend to produce a harsher mix than normal. However, using the mix suitability factor, proposed by Day (1999), reduced this problem. There are some detail differences between the models suggesting further refinements could be carried out and a modification to one of the models is provided.

    AB - This paper reports the findings of a study of four particle packing models used to proportion the mix constituents (solid particles) of concrete to produce a minimum voids ratio (or maximum packing density). The models have been compared using laboratory tests and published data. The basic mathematics of the models is discussed, particularly how each model defines the particle size distribution of the solid particles. The models have been applied to both the aggregate (sand and gravel) and the cement phase (PC, PFA, GGBS and limestone fines) and the estimated voids ratio compared with that measured in the laboratory. It was found that the models give broadly the same output and suggest similar combinations of materials to give the minimum voids ratio. Using the materials considered it was found that the largest improvement in voids ratio was achieved with the aggregate phase. The particle sizes of the cements considered here were similar and, as a result, only small improvements in voids ratio could be achieved. It was noted that proportioning concrete mix constituents to minimise voids ratio did tend to produce a harsher mix than normal. However, using the mix suitability factor, proposed by Day (1999), reduced this problem. There are some detail differences between the models suggesting further refinements could be carried out and a modification to one of the models is provided.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036603335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/BF02482136

    DO - 10.1007/BF02482136

    M3 - Article

    VL - 35

    SP - 301

    EP - 309

    JO - Materials and Structures

    JF - Materials and Structures

    SN - 1359-5997

    IS - 5

    ER -