Democratising or privileging

the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist

Craig Gauld (Lead / Corresponding author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    112 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper will argue that a challenge to the archive has emerged over the past decade with the potential to alter the archival profession and change the role of the archivist as it has been traditionally understood. At its core is a call for the full democratisation of knowledge. Advocates of this movement take on notions of control and mediation in the digital realm, a consequence of which is the potential bypassing of the privileger/gatekeeper. This paper will examine this shift and will argue that now, more than ever, the profession needs to understand and recognise the transformative and democratic effects the archive can have via the act of privileging as it is precisely our continuing reliance upon filtering information for dissemination and preservation that will keep the profession relevant and important in the twenty-first century.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)227-245
    Number of pages19
    JournalArchival Science
    Volume17
    Issue number3
    Early online date12 Nov 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

    Fingerprint

    archivist
    democratization
    profession
    gatekeeper
    twenty-first century
    privilege
    mediation
    Archivists
    Democratization

    Keywords

    • Democratising
    • Privileging
    • Archivist
    • Gatekeeper
    • Evidence
    • Knowledge
    • Access
    • Digital

    Cite this

    @article{4093b87a452f41cd8524055e9f8dffed,
    title = "Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist",
    abstract = "This paper will argue that a challenge to the archive has emerged over the past decade with the potential to alter the archival profession and change the role of the archivist as it has been traditionally understood. At its core is a call for the full democratisation of knowledge. Advocates of this movement take on notions of control and mediation in the digital realm, a consequence of which is the potential bypassing of the privileger/gatekeeper. This paper will examine this shift and will argue that now, more than ever, the profession needs to understand and recognise the transformative and democratic effects the archive can have via the act of privileging as it is precisely our continuing reliance upon filtering information for dissemination and preservation that will keep the profession relevant and important in the twenty-first century.",
    keywords = "Democratising, Privileging, Archivist, Gatekeeper, Evidence, Knowledge, Access, Digital",
    author = "Craig Gauld",
    year = "2017",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4",
    language = "English",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "227--245",
    journal = "Archival Science",
    issn = "1389-0166",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Democratising or privileging

    T2 - the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist

    AU - Gauld, Craig

    PY - 2017/9

    Y1 - 2017/9

    N2 - This paper will argue that a challenge to the archive has emerged over the past decade with the potential to alter the archival profession and change the role of the archivist as it has been traditionally understood. At its core is a call for the full democratisation of knowledge. Advocates of this movement take on notions of control and mediation in the digital realm, a consequence of which is the potential bypassing of the privileger/gatekeeper. This paper will examine this shift and will argue that now, more than ever, the profession needs to understand and recognise the transformative and democratic effects the archive can have via the act of privileging as it is precisely our continuing reliance upon filtering information for dissemination and preservation that will keep the profession relevant and important in the twenty-first century.

    AB - This paper will argue that a challenge to the archive has emerged over the past decade with the potential to alter the archival profession and change the role of the archivist as it has been traditionally understood. At its core is a call for the full democratisation of knowledge. Advocates of this movement take on notions of control and mediation in the digital realm, a consequence of which is the potential bypassing of the privileger/gatekeeper. This paper will examine this shift and will argue that now, more than ever, the profession needs to understand and recognise the transformative and democratic effects the archive can have via the act of privileging as it is precisely our continuing reliance upon filtering information for dissemination and preservation that will keep the profession relevant and important in the twenty-first century.

    KW - Democratising

    KW - Privileging

    KW - Archivist

    KW - Gatekeeper

    KW - Evidence

    KW - Knowledge

    KW - Access

    KW - Digital

    U2 - 10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4

    DO - 10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4

    M3 - Article

    VL - 17

    SP - 227

    EP - 245

    JO - Archival Science

    JF - Archival Science

    SN - 1389-0166

    IS - 3

    ER -