Different stakeholder perceptions of sustainability assessment

H. Al Waer, M. Sibley, J. Lewis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    40 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Measuring the level of sustainability of a construction project is difficult when dealing with qualitative data and determining the most objective method for measuring such projects as defined by various stakeholders. The issue of judgment and interpretation remains difficult as it encompasses subjectivity and differing stakeholders' perceptions in assessment. This paper addresses sustainability assessment in regional shopping centres and develops a tool for architects, clients, producers and end-users to understand better building performance. This paper defines the potential problems of subjectivity in sustainability assessment arising from differing views of stakeholders and decision-makers. It addresses differences between labelling and rating systems and compares the importance of each system. This paper also highlights how priority levels used in sustainability assessment can vary between stakeholders on the assumption that the performance level for proposed indicators has equal value between stakeholders. This stage is carried out through the provision of feedback by each interested party on their perceptions of priority levels and impact of selected sustainability criteria for regional shopping centres. It is concluded that the priority level is largely dependent on who is carrying out the evaluation, and thus results in subjective assessments.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)48-59
    Number of pages12
    JournalArchitectural Science Review
    Volume51
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    Sustainable development
    Shopping centers
    Labeling
    Feedback

    Cite this

    Al Waer, H. ; Sibley, M. ; Lewis, J. / Different stakeholder perceptions of sustainability assessment. In: Architectural Science Review. 2008 ; Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 48-59.
    @article{e9dab6f133894ab98e349630de5756a7,
    title = "Different stakeholder perceptions of sustainability assessment",
    abstract = "Measuring the level of sustainability of a construction project is difficult when dealing with qualitative data and determining the most objective method for measuring such projects as defined by various stakeholders. The issue of judgment and interpretation remains difficult as it encompasses subjectivity and differing stakeholders' perceptions in assessment. This paper addresses sustainability assessment in regional shopping centres and develops a tool for architects, clients, producers and end-users to understand better building performance. This paper defines the potential problems of subjectivity in sustainability assessment arising from differing views of stakeholders and decision-makers. It addresses differences between labelling and rating systems and compares the importance of each system. This paper also highlights how priority levels used in sustainability assessment can vary between stakeholders on the assumption that the performance level for proposed indicators has equal value between stakeholders. This stage is carried out through the provision of feedback by each interested party on their perceptions of priority levels and impact of selected sustainability criteria for regional shopping centres. It is concluded that the priority level is largely dependent on who is carrying out the evaluation, and thus results in subjective assessments.",
    author = "{Al Waer}, H. and M. Sibley and J. Lewis",
    note = "Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
    year = "2008",
    doi = "10.3763/asre.2008.5107",
    language = "English",
    volume = "51",
    pages = "48--59",
    journal = "Architectural Science Review",
    issn = "0003-8628",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "1",

    }

    Different stakeholder perceptions of sustainability assessment. / Al Waer, H.; Sibley, M.; Lewis, J.

    In: Architectural Science Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2008, p. 48-59.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Different stakeholder perceptions of sustainability assessment

    AU - Al Waer, H.

    AU - Sibley, M.

    AU - Lewis, J.

    N1 - Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - Measuring the level of sustainability of a construction project is difficult when dealing with qualitative data and determining the most objective method for measuring such projects as defined by various stakeholders. The issue of judgment and interpretation remains difficult as it encompasses subjectivity and differing stakeholders' perceptions in assessment. This paper addresses sustainability assessment in regional shopping centres and develops a tool for architects, clients, producers and end-users to understand better building performance. This paper defines the potential problems of subjectivity in sustainability assessment arising from differing views of stakeholders and decision-makers. It addresses differences between labelling and rating systems and compares the importance of each system. This paper also highlights how priority levels used in sustainability assessment can vary between stakeholders on the assumption that the performance level for proposed indicators has equal value between stakeholders. This stage is carried out through the provision of feedback by each interested party on their perceptions of priority levels and impact of selected sustainability criteria for regional shopping centres. It is concluded that the priority level is largely dependent on who is carrying out the evaluation, and thus results in subjective assessments.

    AB - Measuring the level of sustainability of a construction project is difficult when dealing with qualitative data and determining the most objective method for measuring such projects as defined by various stakeholders. The issue of judgment and interpretation remains difficult as it encompasses subjectivity and differing stakeholders' perceptions in assessment. This paper addresses sustainability assessment in regional shopping centres and develops a tool for architects, clients, producers and end-users to understand better building performance. This paper defines the potential problems of subjectivity in sustainability assessment arising from differing views of stakeholders and decision-makers. It addresses differences between labelling and rating systems and compares the importance of each system. This paper also highlights how priority levels used in sustainability assessment can vary between stakeholders on the assumption that the performance level for proposed indicators has equal value between stakeholders. This stage is carried out through the provision of feedback by each interested party on their perceptions of priority levels and impact of selected sustainability criteria for regional shopping centres. It is concluded that the priority level is largely dependent on who is carrying out the evaluation, and thus results in subjective assessments.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40549140841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3763/asre.2008.5107

    DO - 10.3763/asre.2008.5107

    M3 - Article

    VL - 51

    SP - 48

    EP - 59

    JO - Architectural Science Review

    JF - Architectural Science Review

    SN - 0003-8628

    IS - 1

    ER -