Has the use of the linear incision reduced skin complications in bone-anchored hearing aid implantation?

R. Roplekar, A. Lim, S. S. M. Hussain (Lead / Corresponding author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Objective: To compare the skin-related complications of the traditional skin flap method with a linear incision method of implantation. Method: All cases of bone-anchored hearing aid surgery performed by a single surgeon (n = 117) were compared over two periods: 1999–2011, when the traditional method of skin flap and soft tissue removal was used (group 1; n = 86), and 2012–2013, when linear incision without soft tissue removal was used (group 2; n = 31). All patients were followed up for one year and complications were recorded for that period. Results: There were 21 (24.4 per cent) skin-related complications in group 1 (skin overgrowth = 12, wound infection = 8 and numbness = 1) and 3 (9.7 per cent) complications in group 2 (wound infection = 3). Analysis using independent t-tests showed the results to be significant (p <0.05; 95 per cent confidence interval = 0.0800–0.4473). Conclusion: The linear incision without soft tissue removal method for bone-anchored hearing aid implantation reduces skin complication rates.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)541-544
    Number of pages4
    JournalJournal of Laryngology and Otology
    Volume130
    Issue number6
    Early online date10 May 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

    Fingerprint

    Hearing Aids
    Bone and Bones
    Skin
    Wound Infection
    Hypesthesia
    Confidence Intervals

    Keywords

    • Complications
    • Hearing Aids
    • Osseointegration
    • Wound Healing
    • Wound Infection

    Cite this

    @article{3529a01a9c4f4fc285560f9d1be0ba07,
    title = "Has the use of the linear incision reduced skin complications in bone-anchored hearing aid implantation?",
    abstract = "Objective: To compare the skin-related complications of the traditional skin flap method with a linear incision method of implantation. Method: All cases of bone-anchored hearing aid surgery performed by a single surgeon (n = 117) were compared over two periods: 1999–2011, when the traditional method of skin flap and soft tissue removal was used (group 1; n = 86), and 2012–2013, when linear incision without soft tissue removal was used (group 2; n = 31). All patients were followed up for one year and complications were recorded for that period. Results: There were 21 (24.4 per cent) skin-related complications in group 1 (skin overgrowth = 12, wound infection = 8 and numbness = 1) and 3 (9.7 per cent) complications in group 2 (wound infection = 3). Analysis using independent t-tests showed the results to be significant (p <0.05; 95 per cent confidence interval = 0.0800–0.4473). Conclusion: The linear incision without soft tissue removal method for bone-anchored hearing aid implantation reduces skin complication rates.",
    keywords = "Complications, Hearing Aids, Osseointegration, Wound Healing, Wound Infection",
    author = "R. Roplekar and A. Lim and Hussain, {S. S. M.}",
    year = "2016",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1017/S0022215116001080",
    language = "English",
    volume = "130",
    pages = "541--544",
    journal = "Journal of Laryngology and Otology",
    issn = "0022-2151",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "6",

    }

    Has the use of the linear incision reduced skin complications in bone-anchored hearing aid implantation? / Roplekar, R.; Lim, A.; Hussain, S. S. M. (Lead / Corresponding author).

    In: Journal of Laryngology and Otology, Vol. 130, No. 6, 06.2016, p. 541-544.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Has the use of the linear incision reduced skin complications in bone-anchored hearing aid implantation?

    AU - Roplekar, R.

    AU - Lim, A.

    AU - Hussain, S. S. M.

    PY - 2016/6

    Y1 - 2016/6

    N2 - Objective: To compare the skin-related complications of the traditional skin flap method with a linear incision method of implantation. Method: All cases of bone-anchored hearing aid surgery performed by a single surgeon (n = 117) were compared over two periods: 1999–2011, when the traditional method of skin flap and soft tissue removal was used (group 1; n = 86), and 2012–2013, when linear incision without soft tissue removal was used (group 2; n = 31). All patients were followed up for one year and complications were recorded for that period. Results: There were 21 (24.4 per cent) skin-related complications in group 1 (skin overgrowth = 12, wound infection = 8 and numbness = 1) and 3 (9.7 per cent) complications in group 2 (wound infection = 3). Analysis using independent t-tests showed the results to be significant (p <0.05; 95 per cent confidence interval = 0.0800–0.4473). Conclusion: The linear incision without soft tissue removal method for bone-anchored hearing aid implantation reduces skin complication rates.

    AB - Objective: To compare the skin-related complications of the traditional skin flap method with a linear incision method of implantation. Method: All cases of bone-anchored hearing aid surgery performed by a single surgeon (n = 117) were compared over two periods: 1999–2011, when the traditional method of skin flap and soft tissue removal was used (group 1; n = 86), and 2012–2013, when linear incision without soft tissue removal was used (group 2; n = 31). All patients were followed up for one year and complications were recorded for that period. Results: There were 21 (24.4 per cent) skin-related complications in group 1 (skin overgrowth = 12, wound infection = 8 and numbness = 1) and 3 (9.7 per cent) complications in group 2 (wound infection = 3). Analysis using independent t-tests showed the results to be significant (p <0.05; 95 per cent confidence interval = 0.0800–0.4473). Conclusion: The linear incision without soft tissue removal method for bone-anchored hearing aid implantation reduces skin complication rates.

    KW - Complications

    KW - Hearing Aids

    KW - Osseointegration

    KW - Wound Healing

    KW - Wound Infection

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966558995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S0022215116001080

    DO - 10.1017/S0022215116001080

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 27160014

    AN - SCOPUS:84966558995

    VL - 130

    SP - 541

    EP - 544

    JO - Journal of Laryngology and Otology

    JF - Journal of Laryngology and Otology

    SN - 0022-2151

    IS - 6

    ER -