Is anaphoric reference cooperative?

Leila Kantola (Lead / Corresponding author), Roger P. G. van Gompel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Two experiments investigated whether the choice of anaphoric expression is affected by the presence of an addressee. Following a context sentence and visual scene, participants described a target scene that required anaphoric reference. They described the scene either to an addressee (Experiment 1) or without an addressee (Experiment 2). When an addressee was present in the task, participants used more pronouns and fewer repeated noun phrases when the referent was the grammatical subject in the context sentence than when it was the grammatical object and they used more pronouns when there was no competitor than when there was. They used fewer pronouns and more repeated noun phrases when a visual competitor was present in the scene than when there was no visual competitor. In the absence of an addressee, linguistic context effects were the same as those when an addressee was present, but the visual effect of the competitor disappeared. We conclude that visual salience effects are due to adjustments that speakers make when they produce reference for an addressee, whereas linguistic salience effects appear whether or not speakers have addressees.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1109-1128
Number of pages20
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume69
Issue number6
Early online date6 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Linguistics

Keywords

  • Anaphor
  • Audience design
  • Linguistic salience
  • Visual context

Cite this

@article{10eb03756e3443d2b28fa9568971781d,
title = "Is anaphoric reference cooperative?",
abstract = "Two experiments investigated whether the choice of anaphoric expression is affected by the presence of an addressee. Following a context sentence and visual scene, participants described a target scene that required anaphoric reference. They described the scene either to an addressee (Experiment 1) or without an addressee (Experiment 2). When an addressee was present in the task, participants used more pronouns and fewer repeated noun phrases when the referent was the grammatical subject in the context sentence than when it was the grammatical object and they used more pronouns when there was no competitor than when there was. They used fewer pronouns and more repeated noun phrases when a visual competitor was present in the scene than when there was no visual competitor. In the absence of an addressee, linguistic context effects were the same as those when an addressee was present, but the visual effect of the competitor disappeared. We conclude that visual salience effects are due to adjustments that speakers make when they produce reference for an addressee, whereas linguistic salience effects appear whether or not speakers have addressees.",
keywords = "Anaphor, Audience design, Linguistic salience, Visual context",
author = "Leila Kantola and {van Gompel}, {Roger P. G.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/17470218.2015.1070184",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "1109--1128",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

Is anaphoric reference cooperative? / Kantola, Leila (Lead / Corresponding author); van Gompel, Roger P. G.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 69, No. 6, 2015, p. 1109-1128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is anaphoric reference cooperative?

AU - Kantola, Leila

AU - van Gompel, Roger P. G.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Two experiments investigated whether the choice of anaphoric expression is affected by the presence of an addressee. Following a context sentence and visual scene, participants described a target scene that required anaphoric reference. They described the scene either to an addressee (Experiment 1) or without an addressee (Experiment 2). When an addressee was present in the task, participants used more pronouns and fewer repeated noun phrases when the referent was the grammatical subject in the context sentence than when it was the grammatical object and they used more pronouns when there was no competitor than when there was. They used fewer pronouns and more repeated noun phrases when a visual competitor was present in the scene than when there was no visual competitor. In the absence of an addressee, linguistic context effects were the same as those when an addressee was present, but the visual effect of the competitor disappeared. We conclude that visual salience effects are due to adjustments that speakers make when they produce reference for an addressee, whereas linguistic salience effects appear whether or not speakers have addressees.

AB - Two experiments investigated whether the choice of anaphoric expression is affected by the presence of an addressee. Following a context sentence and visual scene, participants described a target scene that required anaphoric reference. They described the scene either to an addressee (Experiment 1) or without an addressee (Experiment 2). When an addressee was present in the task, participants used more pronouns and fewer repeated noun phrases when the referent was the grammatical subject in the context sentence than when it was the grammatical object and they used more pronouns when there was no competitor than when there was. They used fewer pronouns and more repeated noun phrases when a visual competitor was present in the scene than when there was no visual competitor. In the absence of an addressee, linguistic context effects were the same as those when an addressee was present, but the visual effect of the competitor disappeared. We conclude that visual salience effects are due to adjustments that speakers make when they produce reference for an addressee, whereas linguistic salience effects appear whether or not speakers have addressees.

KW - Anaphor

KW - Audience design

KW - Linguistic salience

KW - Visual context

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84961196395&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Is+anaphoric+reference+cooperative&st2=&sid=23ECC29E408A0A5CD1F5B6AF25AD3ED5.wsnAw8kcdt7IPYLO0V48gA%3a120&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=49&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28Is+anaphoric+reference+cooperative%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=

U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2015.1070184

DO - 10.1080/17470218.2015.1070184

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 1109

EP - 1128

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 6

ER -