Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    81 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Peer assessment is very various in its implementation. Six studies of peer assessment are reviewed, four of them in higher education. A literature review is followed by five empirical studies. Strengths and weaknesses of each study are considered and issues are raised. Variables in peer assessment needing further exploration are extricated – in sample definition, specification of type of peer assessment, organisational nature of the intervention, and the measures which are used to evaluate change. It is suggested that further experimental and quasi-experimental studies are necessary to contrast one or two of these variables at a time.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)339-343
    Number of pages5
    JournalLearning and Instruction
    Volume20
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

    Fingerprint

    Education
    Non-Randomized Controlled Trials
    education
    literature
    time

    Keywords

    • Peer feedback
    • Type of peer assessment
    • Intervention
    • Sample definition
    • Measure of change

    Cite this

    @article{ccf40218e98a44019c7e5eff9298edf1,
    title = "Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment",
    abstract = "Peer assessment is very various in its implementation. Six studies of peer assessment are reviewed, four of them in higher education. A literature review is followed by five empirical studies. Strengths and weaknesses of each study are considered and issues are raised. Variables in peer assessment needing further exploration are extricated – in sample definition, specification of type of peer assessment, organisational nature of the intervention, and the measures which are used to evaluate change. It is suggested that further experimental and quasi-experimental studies are necessary to contrast one or two of these variables at a time.",
    keywords = "Peer feedback, Type of peer assessment, Intervention, Sample definition, Measure of change",
    author = "Topping, {Keith J.}",
    year = "2010",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "339--343",
    journal = "Learning and Instruction",
    issn = "0959-4752",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "4",

    }

    Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. / Topping, Keith J.

    In: Learning and Instruction, Vol. 20, No. 4, 08.2010, p. 339-343.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment

    AU - Topping, Keith J.

    PY - 2010/8

    Y1 - 2010/8

    N2 - Peer assessment is very various in its implementation. Six studies of peer assessment are reviewed, four of them in higher education. A literature review is followed by five empirical studies. Strengths and weaknesses of each study are considered and issues are raised. Variables in peer assessment needing further exploration are extricated – in sample definition, specification of type of peer assessment, organisational nature of the intervention, and the measures which are used to evaluate change. It is suggested that further experimental and quasi-experimental studies are necessary to contrast one or two of these variables at a time.

    AB - Peer assessment is very various in its implementation. Six studies of peer assessment are reviewed, four of them in higher education. A literature review is followed by five empirical studies. Strengths and weaknesses of each study are considered and issues are raised. Variables in peer assessment needing further exploration are extricated – in sample definition, specification of type of peer assessment, organisational nature of the intervention, and the measures which are used to evaluate change. It is suggested that further experimental and quasi-experimental studies are necessary to contrast one or two of these variables at a time.

    KW - Peer feedback

    KW - Type of peer assessment

    KW - Intervention

    KW - Sample definition

    KW - Measure of change

    U2 - 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003

    DO - 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 339

    EP - 343

    JO - Learning and Instruction

    JF - Learning and Instruction

    SN - 0959-4752

    IS - 4

    ER -