Naturalism and Environmentalism

a Response to Hinchman

Brian Baxter

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The values which are definitive of the humanist project, such as freedom and self-determination, are of central concern to environmentalism. This means, according to Lewis P. Hinchman, that environmentalists should seek a rapprochement with humanism, rather than rejecting it for its apparent anthropocentrism. He argues that this requires in turn the acceptance of those approaches to human self-understanding which are central to the hermeneutic traditions and the rejection of naturalist approaches, such as sociobiology, which is accused of producing deterministic, reifying, reductionist, dehumanising forms of understanding of human beings and human life. This paper seeks to show that sociobiology does not pose the kinds of threat to humanism and environmentalism outlined by Hinchman
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)51-68
    Number of pages18
    JournalEnvironmental Values
    Volume15
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006

    Fingerprint

    sociobiology
    environmentalism
    hermeneutics
    self determination
    Naturalism
    Humanism
    Environmentalism
    Sociobiology

    Keywords

    • Humanism
    • Sociobiology
    • Naturalism
    • Reductionism
    • Environmental ethics

    Cite this

    Baxter, Brian. / Naturalism and Environmentalism : a Response to Hinchman. In: Environmental Values. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 51-68.
    @article{d19f81a39f554c3fb60b02ce25ccb31f,
    title = "Naturalism and Environmentalism: a Response to Hinchman",
    abstract = "The values which are definitive of the humanist project, such as freedom and self-determination, are of central concern to environmentalism. This means, according to Lewis P. Hinchman, that environmentalists should seek a rapprochement with humanism, rather than rejecting it for its apparent anthropocentrism. He argues that this requires in turn the acceptance of those approaches to human self-understanding which are central to the hermeneutic traditions and the rejection of naturalist approaches, such as sociobiology, which is accused of producing deterministic, reifying, reductionist, dehumanising forms of understanding of human beings and human life. This paper seeks to show that sociobiology does not pose the kinds of threat to humanism and environmentalism outlined by Hinchman",
    keywords = "Humanism, Sociobiology, Naturalism, Reductionism, Environmental ethics",
    author = "Brian Baxter",
    note = "dc.publisher: White Horse Press",
    year = "2006",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.3197/096327106776678933",
    language = "English",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "51--68",
    journal = "Environmental Values",
    issn = "0963-2719",
    publisher = "White Horse Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    Naturalism and Environmentalism : a Response to Hinchman. / Baxter, Brian.

    In: Environmental Values, Vol. 15, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 51-68.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Naturalism and Environmentalism

    T2 - a Response to Hinchman

    AU - Baxter, Brian

    N1 - dc.publisher: White Horse Press

    PY - 2006/2

    Y1 - 2006/2

    N2 - The values which are definitive of the humanist project, such as freedom and self-determination, are of central concern to environmentalism. This means, according to Lewis P. Hinchman, that environmentalists should seek a rapprochement with humanism, rather than rejecting it for its apparent anthropocentrism. He argues that this requires in turn the acceptance of those approaches to human self-understanding which are central to the hermeneutic traditions and the rejection of naturalist approaches, such as sociobiology, which is accused of producing deterministic, reifying, reductionist, dehumanising forms of understanding of human beings and human life. This paper seeks to show that sociobiology does not pose the kinds of threat to humanism and environmentalism outlined by Hinchman

    AB - The values which are definitive of the humanist project, such as freedom and self-determination, are of central concern to environmentalism. This means, according to Lewis P. Hinchman, that environmentalists should seek a rapprochement with humanism, rather than rejecting it for its apparent anthropocentrism. He argues that this requires in turn the acceptance of those approaches to human self-understanding which are central to the hermeneutic traditions and the rejection of naturalist approaches, such as sociobiology, which is accused of producing deterministic, reifying, reductionist, dehumanising forms of understanding of human beings and human life. This paper seeks to show that sociobiology does not pose the kinds of threat to humanism and environmentalism outlined by Hinchman

    KW - Humanism

    KW - Sociobiology

    KW - Naturalism

    KW - Reductionism

    KW - Environmental ethics

    U2 - 10.3197/096327106776678933

    DO - 10.3197/096327106776678933

    M3 - Article

    VL - 15

    SP - 51

    EP - 68

    JO - Environmental Values

    JF - Environmental Values

    SN - 0963-2719

    IS - 1

    ER -