Population geographies for the 21st Century

Allan M. Findlay

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The paper argues the case for population geography as a strong, self-aware sub-discipline that plays to its strengths, while not abandoning innovation. In place of hollow calls for (re)-theorisation, population geographers should first recognise their claims to certain kinds of praxis in contributing to an ethical and equitable society through the insights that population geography can bring. Second, the paper argues that rather than focusing on bringing social theory into population geography, there is more potential in examining how (in)adequately social theory has engaged with demographic issues. Third, the paper suggests that population geographers need to think about the new contexts in which they are engaging with large spatially-referenced numerical data sets.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)177-190
    Number of pages14
    JournalScottish Geographical Journal
    Volume119
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint

    twenty first century
    social theory
    geography
    innovation

    Keywords

    • Population geography
    • Social theory
    • Quantitative methods

    Cite this

    Findlay, Allan M. / Population geographies for the 21st Century. In: Scottish Geographical Journal. 2003 ; Vol. 119, No. 3. pp. 177-190.
    @article{57ed64650359493caca48acec26594b6,
    title = "Population geographies for the 21st Century",
    abstract = "The paper argues the case for population geography as a strong, self-aware sub-discipline that plays to its strengths, while not abandoning innovation. In place of hollow calls for (re)-theorisation, population geographers should first recognise their claims to certain kinds of praxis in contributing to an ethical and equitable society through the insights that population geography can bring. Second, the paper argues that rather than focusing on bringing social theory into population geography, there is more potential in examining how (in)adequately social theory has engaged with demographic issues. Third, the paper suggests that population geographers need to think about the new contexts in which they are engaging with large spatially-referenced numerical data sets.",
    keywords = "Population geography, Social theory, Quantitative methods",
    author = "Findlay, {Allan M.}",
    note = "dc.publisher: Taylor & Francis",
    year = "2003",
    doi = "10.1080/00369220318737173",
    language = "English",
    volume = "119",
    pages = "177--190",
    journal = "Scottish Geographical Journal",
    issn = "1470-2541",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "3",

    }

    Population geographies for the 21st Century. / Findlay, Allan M.

    In: Scottish Geographical Journal, Vol. 119, No. 3, 2003, p. 177-190.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Population geographies for the 21st Century

    AU - Findlay, Allan M.

    N1 - dc.publisher: Taylor & Francis

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - The paper argues the case for population geography as a strong, self-aware sub-discipline that plays to its strengths, while not abandoning innovation. In place of hollow calls for (re)-theorisation, population geographers should first recognise their claims to certain kinds of praxis in contributing to an ethical and equitable society through the insights that population geography can bring. Second, the paper argues that rather than focusing on bringing social theory into population geography, there is more potential in examining how (in)adequately social theory has engaged with demographic issues. Third, the paper suggests that population geographers need to think about the new contexts in which they are engaging with large spatially-referenced numerical data sets.

    AB - The paper argues the case for population geography as a strong, self-aware sub-discipline that plays to its strengths, while not abandoning innovation. In place of hollow calls for (re)-theorisation, population geographers should first recognise their claims to certain kinds of praxis in contributing to an ethical and equitable society through the insights that population geography can bring. Second, the paper argues that rather than focusing on bringing social theory into population geography, there is more potential in examining how (in)adequately social theory has engaged with demographic issues. Third, the paper suggests that population geographers need to think about the new contexts in which they are engaging with large spatially-referenced numerical data sets.

    KW - Population geography

    KW - Social theory

    KW - Quantitative methods

    U2 - 10.1080/00369220318737173

    DO - 10.1080/00369220318737173

    M3 - Article

    VL - 119

    SP - 177

    EP - 190

    JO - Scottish Geographical Journal

    JF - Scottish Geographical Journal

    SN - 1470-2541

    IS - 3

    ER -