Researching the home using architectural and social science methods

Camilla Lewis (Lead / Corresponding author), Vanessa May, Stephen Hicks, Sandra Costa Santos, Nadia Bertolino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper explores the possibilities of using innovative, interdisciplinary methods for understanding home-making. Drawing on a study of Claremont Court (1959-62), a post-war social housing scheme designed by Sir Basil Spence in Edinburgh, we discuss the methodological potentials of combining architectural and social science methods to study the home. Claremont Court was built in the post-war era as part of Scotland’s social housing drive. It was designed following the principles of ‘cross-class’ living in order to foster a sense of community. In subsequent years, inhabitants of the court have adapted their dwellings in numerous ways and the population of the court has changed dramatically. But while meanings of home and understandings of the division between public and private have been reconfigured, the spatial layouts of the dwellings continue to shape residents’ sense of home. To explore how residents make home at Claremont Court, we use ‘facet methodology’ (Mason, 2011) which opens up new ways of thinking about the research process through a ‘playful’ approach to epistemology. In doing so, we develop an innovative approach which combines architectural methods (including survey drawings and visual mappings of both dwellings and communal areas) with social science methods (including ‘traditional’ interviews and walk-along interviews). To conclude, we discuss the possibility of widening the scope of qualitative research by bringing architectural and social science methods into dialogue through visual methods, in order to attend to spatial and material aspects of the home. We argue that our novel cross-disciplinary approach broadens understandings of home, by bringing attention to the unspoken dimensions of physical space, embodied elements of home and what people said about their homes, all of which are central to home-making.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalMethodological Innovations
Early online date31 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 31 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

social science
social housing
resident
interview
research process
layout
epistemology
inhabitant
qualitative research
dialogue
methodology
community

Keywords

  • Architecture
  • dwelling
  • facet methodology
  • home
  • modernist housing
  • place
  • social work
  • sociology
  • space

Cite this

Lewis, Camilla ; May, Vanessa ; Hicks, Stephen ; Costa Santos, Sandra ; Bertolino, Nadia. / Researching the home using architectural and social science methods. In: Methodological Innovations. 2018.
@article{c31f16eb12b0410b929b4ea57b18b716,
title = "Researching the home using architectural and social science methods",
abstract = "This paper explores the possibilities of using innovative, interdisciplinary methods for understanding home-making. Drawing on a study of Claremont Court (1959-62), a post-war social housing scheme designed by Sir Basil Spence in Edinburgh, we discuss the methodological potentials of combining architectural and social science methods to study the home. Claremont Court was built in the post-war era as part of Scotland’s social housing drive. It was designed following the principles of ‘cross-class’ living in order to foster a sense of community. In subsequent years, inhabitants of the court have adapted their dwellings in numerous ways and the population of the court has changed dramatically. But while meanings of home and understandings of the division between public and private have been reconfigured, the spatial layouts of the dwellings continue to shape residents’ sense of home. To explore how residents make home at Claremont Court, we use ‘facet methodology’ (Mason, 2011) which opens up new ways of thinking about the research process through a ‘playful’ approach to epistemology. In doing so, we develop an innovative approach which combines architectural methods (including survey drawings and visual mappings of both dwellings and communal areas) with social science methods (including ‘traditional’ interviews and walk-along interviews). To conclude, we discuss the possibility of widening the scope of qualitative research by bringing architectural and social science methods into dialogue through visual methods, in order to attend to spatial and material aspects of the home. We argue that our novel cross-disciplinary approach broadens understandings of home, by bringing attention to the unspoken dimensions of physical space, embodied elements of home and what people said about their homes, all of which are central to home-making.",
keywords = "Architecture, dwelling, facet methodology, home, modernist housing, place, social work, sociology, space",
author = "Camilla Lewis and Vanessa May and Stephen Hicks and {Costa Santos}, Sandra and Nadia Bertolino",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1177{\%}2F2059799118796006",
language = "English",
journal = "Methodological Innovations",
issn = "2059-7991",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

Researching the home using architectural and social science methods. / Lewis, Camilla (Lead / Corresponding author); May, Vanessa; Hicks, Stephen; Costa Santos, Sandra; Bertolino, Nadia.

In: Methodological Innovations, 31.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Researching the home using architectural and social science methods

AU - Lewis, Camilla

AU - May, Vanessa

AU - Hicks, Stephen

AU - Costa Santos, Sandra

AU - Bertolino, Nadia

PY - 2018/8/31

Y1 - 2018/8/31

N2 - This paper explores the possibilities of using innovative, interdisciplinary methods for understanding home-making. Drawing on a study of Claremont Court (1959-62), a post-war social housing scheme designed by Sir Basil Spence in Edinburgh, we discuss the methodological potentials of combining architectural and social science methods to study the home. Claremont Court was built in the post-war era as part of Scotland’s social housing drive. It was designed following the principles of ‘cross-class’ living in order to foster a sense of community. In subsequent years, inhabitants of the court have adapted their dwellings in numerous ways and the population of the court has changed dramatically. But while meanings of home and understandings of the division between public and private have been reconfigured, the spatial layouts of the dwellings continue to shape residents’ sense of home. To explore how residents make home at Claremont Court, we use ‘facet methodology’ (Mason, 2011) which opens up new ways of thinking about the research process through a ‘playful’ approach to epistemology. In doing so, we develop an innovative approach which combines architectural methods (including survey drawings and visual mappings of both dwellings and communal areas) with social science methods (including ‘traditional’ interviews and walk-along interviews). To conclude, we discuss the possibility of widening the scope of qualitative research by bringing architectural and social science methods into dialogue through visual methods, in order to attend to spatial and material aspects of the home. We argue that our novel cross-disciplinary approach broadens understandings of home, by bringing attention to the unspoken dimensions of physical space, embodied elements of home and what people said about their homes, all of which are central to home-making.

AB - This paper explores the possibilities of using innovative, interdisciplinary methods for understanding home-making. Drawing on a study of Claremont Court (1959-62), a post-war social housing scheme designed by Sir Basil Spence in Edinburgh, we discuss the methodological potentials of combining architectural and social science methods to study the home. Claremont Court was built in the post-war era as part of Scotland’s social housing drive. It was designed following the principles of ‘cross-class’ living in order to foster a sense of community. In subsequent years, inhabitants of the court have adapted their dwellings in numerous ways and the population of the court has changed dramatically. But while meanings of home and understandings of the division between public and private have been reconfigured, the spatial layouts of the dwellings continue to shape residents’ sense of home. To explore how residents make home at Claremont Court, we use ‘facet methodology’ (Mason, 2011) which opens up new ways of thinking about the research process through a ‘playful’ approach to epistemology. In doing so, we develop an innovative approach which combines architectural methods (including survey drawings and visual mappings of both dwellings and communal areas) with social science methods (including ‘traditional’ interviews and walk-along interviews). To conclude, we discuss the possibility of widening the scope of qualitative research by bringing architectural and social science methods into dialogue through visual methods, in order to attend to spatial and material aspects of the home. We argue that our novel cross-disciplinary approach broadens understandings of home, by bringing attention to the unspoken dimensions of physical space, embodied elements of home and what people said about their homes, all of which are central to home-making.

KW - Architecture

KW - dwelling

KW - facet methodology

KW - home

KW - modernist housing

KW - place

KW - social work

KW - sociology

KW - space

U2 - 10.1177%2F2059799118796006

DO - 10.1177%2F2059799118796006

M3 - Article

JO - Methodological Innovations

JF - Methodological Innovations

SN - 2059-7991

ER -