Temporary brittle bone disease: relationship between clinical findings and judicial outcome

Colin R. Paterson (Lead / Corresponding author), Elizabeth A. Monk

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)
    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    There is a wide differential diagnosis for the child with unexplained fractures including non-accidental injury, osteogenesis imperfecta and vitamin D deficiency rickets. Over the last 20 years we and others have described a self-limiting syndrome characterised by fractures in the first year of life. This has been given the provisional name temporary brittle bone disease. This work had proved controversial mostly because the fractures, including rib fractures and metaphyseal fractures, were those previously regarded as typical or even diagnostic of non-accidental injury. Some have asserted that the condition does not exist. Over the years 1985 to 2000 we investigated 87 such cases with fractures with a view to determining the future care of the children. In 85 of these the judiciary was involved. We examined the clinical and radiological findings in the 33 cases in which there was a judicial finding of abuse, the 24 cases in which the parents were exonerated and the 28 cases in which no formal judicial finding was made. The three groups of patients were similar in terms of demographics, age at fracturing and details of the fractures. The clinical similarities between the three groups of patients contrast with the very different results of the judicial process.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere24
    Pages (from-to)97-99
    Number of pages3
    JournalPediatric Reports
    Volume3
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2011

    Fingerprint

    Osteogenesis Imperfecta
    Rib Fractures
    Rickets
    Vitamin D Deficiency
    Wounds and Injuries
    Child Care
    Names
    Differential Diagnosis
    Parents
    Demography

    Keywords

    • temporary brittle bond disease
    • osteogenesis imperfecta
    • non-accidential injury
    • fractures
    • civil litigation

    Cite this

    @article{5e894ad6059e4f5a8f704e55b01082c7,
    title = "Temporary brittle bone disease: relationship between clinical findings and judicial outcome",
    abstract = "There is a wide differential diagnosis for the child with unexplained fractures including non-accidental injury, osteogenesis imperfecta and vitamin D deficiency rickets. Over the last 20 years we and others have described a self-limiting syndrome characterised by fractures in the first year of life. This has been given the provisional name temporary brittle bone disease. This work had proved controversial mostly because the fractures, including rib fractures and metaphyseal fractures, were those previously regarded as typical or even diagnostic of non-accidental injury. Some have asserted that the condition does not exist. Over the years 1985 to 2000 we investigated 87 such cases with fractures with a view to determining the future care of the children. In 85 of these the judiciary was involved. We examined the clinical and radiological findings in the 33 cases in which there was a judicial finding of abuse, the 24 cases in which the parents were exonerated and the 28 cases in which no formal judicial finding was made. The three groups of patients were similar in terms of demographics, age at fracturing and details of the fractures. The clinical similarities between the three groups of patients contrast with the very different results of the judicial process.",
    keywords = "temporary brittle bond disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, non-accidential injury, fractures, civil litigation",
    author = "Paterson, {Colin R.} and Monk, {Elizabeth A.}",
    year = "2011",
    month = "10",
    day = "11",
    doi = "10.4081/pr.2011.e24",
    language = "English",
    volume = "3",
    pages = "97--99",
    journal = "Pediatric Reports",
    issn = "2036-749X",
    publisher = "PAGEPress",
    number = "3",

    }

    Temporary brittle bone disease : relationship between clinical findings and judicial outcome. / Paterson, Colin R. (Lead / Corresponding author); Monk, Elizabeth A.

    In: Pediatric Reports, Vol. 3, No. 3, e24, 11.10.2011, p. 97-99.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Temporary brittle bone disease

    T2 - relationship between clinical findings and judicial outcome

    AU - Paterson, Colin R.

    AU - Monk, Elizabeth A.

    PY - 2011/10/11

    Y1 - 2011/10/11

    N2 - There is a wide differential diagnosis for the child with unexplained fractures including non-accidental injury, osteogenesis imperfecta and vitamin D deficiency rickets. Over the last 20 years we and others have described a self-limiting syndrome characterised by fractures in the first year of life. This has been given the provisional name temporary brittle bone disease. This work had proved controversial mostly because the fractures, including rib fractures and metaphyseal fractures, were those previously regarded as typical or even diagnostic of non-accidental injury. Some have asserted that the condition does not exist. Over the years 1985 to 2000 we investigated 87 such cases with fractures with a view to determining the future care of the children. In 85 of these the judiciary was involved. We examined the clinical and radiological findings in the 33 cases in which there was a judicial finding of abuse, the 24 cases in which the parents were exonerated and the 28 cases in which no formal judicial finding was made. The three groups of patients were similar in terms of demographics, age at fracturing and details of the fractures. The clinical similarities between the three groups of patients contrast with the very different results of the judicial process.

    AB - There is a wide differential diagnosis for the child with unexplained fractures including non-accidental injury, osteogenesis imperfecta and vitamin D deficiency rickets. Over the last 20 years we and others have described a self-limiting syndrome characterised by fractures in the first year of life. This has been given the provisional name temporary brittle bone disease. This work had proved controversial mostly because the fractures, including rib fractures and metaphyseal fractures, were those previously regarded as typical or even diagnostic of non-accidental injury. Some have asserted that the condition does not exist. Over the years 1985 to 2000 we investigated 87 such cases with fractures with a view to determining the future care of the children. In 85 of these the judiciary was involved. We examined the clinical and radiological findings in the 33 cases in which there was a judicial finding of abuse, the 24 cases in which the parents were exonerated and the 28 cases in which no formal judicial finding was made. The three groups of patients were similar in terms of demographics, age at fracturing and details of the fractures. The clinical similarities between the three groups of patients contrast with the very different results of the judicial process.

    KW - temporary brittle bond disease

    KW - osteogenesis imperfecta

    KW - non-accidential injury

    KW - fractures

    KW - civil litigation

    U2 - 10.4081/pr.2011.e24

    DO - 10.4081/pr.2011.e24

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 22053268

    VL - 3

    SP - 97

    EP - 99

    JO - Pediatric Reports

    JF - Pediatric Reports

    SN - 2036-749X

    IS - 3

    M1 - e24

    ER -