The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire

validation and reliability in postal research

Blair H. Smith, Kay I. Penny, Alison M. Purves, Calum Munro, Brenda Wilson, Jeremy Grimshaw, W. Alastair Chambers, W. Cairns Smith

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    271 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire has been proposed as an interview-administered, multi-dimensional measure of chronic pain severity in selected populations with chronic pain in the United States of America. It has not previously been tested in the United Kingdom, in self-completion form or in an unselected general population. We undertook a postal survey to assess its reliability, validity and acceptability in these circumstances, using a general practice population in Scotland, with a practice population of 11202 patients. A random sample of 400 patients aged over 18 was drawn, stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular prescriptions for pain-relieving medication. The dimensions and sub-scales of the Chronic Pain Grade were compared with the SF-36 general health questionnaire and questions relating to duration of any pain and attempts to seek treatment for this. The methodological approach proposed by Streiner and Norman (1989) was used to assess validity and reliability. A response rate of 76% was achieved. Cronbach's alpha was >0.9 and item-total correlations were all high, indicating good internal consistency and reliability. Validity was confirmed by psychometric testing, including confirmatory factor analysis. Good correlations with comparable dimensions of the SF-36 general health questionnaire confirmed convergent validity. Construct validity was confirmed by testing scores against duration of pain and treatment sought for pain. We concluded that the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire is a useful, reliable and valid measure of severity of chronic pain. It translates well into UK English and is acceptable in general population postal research. (C) 1997 International Association for the Study of Pain.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)141-147
    Number of pages7
    JournalPain
    Volume71
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 1997

    Keywords

    • Chronic pain
    • Epidemiology
    • Measurement instrument
    • Validation
    • Definition
    • Survey

    Cite this

    Smith, B. H., Penny, K. I., Purves, A. M., Munro, C., Wilson, B., Grimshaw, J., ... Smith, W. C. (1997). The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain, 71(2), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2
    Smith, Blair H. ; Penny, Kay I. ; Purves, Alison M. ; Munro, Calum ; Wilson, Brenda ; Grimshaw, Jeremy ; Chambers, W. Alastair ; Smith, W. Cairns. / The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire : validation and reliability in postal research. In: Pain. 1997 ; Vol. 71, No. 2. pp. 141-147.
    @article{289ed61ee4bf434b956d0e54bfe81c67,
    title = "The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research",
    abstract = "The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire has been proposed as an interview-administered, multi-dimensional measure of chronic pain severity in selected populations with chronic pain in the United States of America. It has not previously been tested in the United Kingdom, in self-completion form or in an unselected general population. We undertook a postal survey to assess its reliability, validity and acceptability in these circumstances, using a general practice population in Scotland, with a practice population of 11202 patients. A random sample of 400 patients aged over 18 was drawn, stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular prescriptions for pain-relieving medication. The dimensions and sub-scales of the Chronic Pain Grade were compared with the SF-36 general health questionnaire and questions relating to duration of any pain and attempts to seek treatment for this. The methodological approach proposed by Streiner and Norman (1989) was used to assess validity and reliability. A response rate of 76{\%} was achieved. Cronbach's alpha was >0.9 and item-total correlations were all high, indicating good internal consistency and reliability. Validity was confirmed by psychometric testing, including confirmatory factor analysis. Good correlations with comparable dimensions of the SF-36 general health questionnaire confirmed convergent validity. Construct validity was confirmed by testing scores against duration of pain and treatment sought for pain. We concluded that the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire is a useful, reliable and valid measure of severity of chronic pain. It translates well into UK English and is acceptable in general population postal research. (C) 1997 International Association for the Study of Pain.",
    keywords = "Chronic pain, Epidemiology, Measurement instrument, Validation, Definition, Survey",
    author = "Smith, {Blair H.} and Penny, {Kay I.} and Purves, {Alison M.} and Calum Munro and Brenda Wilson and Jeremy Grimshaw and Chambers, {W. Alastair} and Smith, {W. Cairns}",
    year = "1997",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2",
    language = "English",
    volume = "71",
    pages = "141--147",
    journal = "Pain",
    issn = "0304-3959",
    publisher = "Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins",
    number = "2",

    }

    Smith, BH, Penny, KI, Purves, AM, Munro, C, Wilson, B, Grimshaw, J, Chambers, WA & Smith, WC 1997, 'The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research', Pain, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2

    The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire : validation and reliability in postal research. / Smith, Blair H.; Penny, Kay I.; Purves, Alison M.; Munro, Calum; Wilson, Brenda; Grimshaw, Jeremy; Chambers, W. Alastair; Smith, W. Cairns.

    In: Pain, Vol. 71, No. 2, 06.1997, p. 141-147.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire

    T2 - validation and reliability in postal research

    AU - Smith, Blair H.

    AU - Penny, Kay I.

    AU - Purves, Alison M.

    AU - Munro, Calum

    AU - Wilson, Brenda

    AU - Grimshaw, Jeremy

    AU - Chambers, W. Alastair

    AU - Smith, W. Cairns

    PY - 1997/6

    Y1 - 1997/6

    N2 - The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire has been proposed as an interview-administered, multi-dimensional measure of chronic pain severity in selected populations with chronic pain in the United States of America. It has not previously been tested in the United Kingdom, in self-completion form or in an unselected general population. We undertook a postal survey to assess its reliability, validity and acceptability in these circumstances, using a general practice population in Scotland, with a practice population of 11202 patients. A random sample of 400 patients aged over 18 was drawn, stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular prescriptions for pain-relieving medication. The dimensions and sub-scales of the Chronic Pain Grade were compared with the SF-36 general health questionnaire and questions relating to duration of any pain and attempts to seek treatment for this. The methodological approach proposed by Streiner and Norman (1989) was used to assess validity and reliability. A response rate of 76% was achieved. Cronbach's alpha was >0.9 and item-total correlations were all high, indicating good internal consistency and reliability. Validity was confirmed by psychometric testing, including confirmatory factor analysis. Good correlations with comparable dimensions of the SF-36 general health questionnaire confirmed convergent validity. Construct validity was confirmed by testing scores against duration of pain and treatment sought for pain. We concluded that the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire is a useful, reliable and valid measure of severity of chronic pain. It translates well into UK English and is acceptable in general population postal research. (C) 1997 International Association for the Study of Pain.

    AB - The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire has been proposed as an interview-administered, multi-dimensional measure of chronic pain severity in selected populations with chronic pain in the United States of America. It has not previously been tested in the United Kingdom, in self-completion form or in an unselected general population. We undertook a postal survey to assess its reliability, validity and acceptability in these circumstances, using a general practice population in Scotland, with a practice population of 11202 patients. A random sample of 400 patients aged over 18 was drawn, stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular prescriptions for pain-relieving medication. The dimensions and sub-scales of the Chronic Pain Grade were compared with the SF-36 general health questionnaire and questions relating to duration of any pain and attempts to seek treatment for this. The methodological approach proposed by Streiner and Norman (1989) was used to assess validity and reliability. A response rate of 76% was achieved. Cronbach's alpha was >0.9 and item-total correlations were all high, indicating good internal consistency and reliability. Validity was confirmed by psychometric testing, including confirmatory factor analysis. Good correlations with comparable dimensions of the SF-36 general health questionnaire confirmed convergent validity. Construct validity was confirmed by testing scores against duration of pain and treatment sought for pain. We concluded that the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire is a useful, reliable and valid measure of severity of chronic pain. It translates well into UK English and is acceptable in general population postal research. (C) 1997 International Association for the Study of Pain.

    KW - Chronic pain

    KW - Epidemiology

    KW - Measurement instrument

    KW - Validation

    KW - Definition

    KW - Survey

    U2 - 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2

    DO - 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2

    M3 - Article

    VL - 71

    SP - 141

    EP - 147

    JO - Pain

    JF - Pain

    SN - 0304-3959

    IS - 2

    ER -