The Performative Constitution of Liberal Totalitarianism on Facebook

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

The twenty-first century is often perceived as the century of personal freedom. Unlike the economic freedom of the nineteenth century and the political freedom of the twentieth century, this particular brand of freedom is seen as no longer confined to civic realms, political or bureaucratic structures, nor, in fact, interpellative of a particular moral philosophy.1 Instead it is seen as enabling individuals to choose the very standards by which to live their life. A considerably less enthusiastic account of personal freedom and, in particular, of its relation to choice, is given by the psychologist Barry Schwartz and the philosopher Renata Salecl, authors of The Paradox of Choice and The Tyranny of Choice, respectively. For Schwartz, the widespread belief that the way to maximise individual freedom is to maximise choice is an ill-fated impasse. Not only do hundreds of brands of biscuits, broadband providers, and insurance policies have a paralysing rather than a liberating effect on the individual, they furthermore decrease rather than increase satisfaction levels, much like they increase, rather than decrease disappointment levels. The reason for this are mostly ‘opportunity costs’, the fact that the decision to follow path A invariably results in the lost opportunity to follow path B.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationŽižek and Performance
EditorsBroderick Chow, Alex Mangold
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages94-109
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-137-40319-3
ISBN (Print)978-1-349-48913-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Publication series

NamePerformance Philosophy
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan

Fingerprint

Constitution
Facebook
Disappointment
Political freedom
Paradox
Insurance
Economic freedom
Opportunity cost
20th century
Broadband

Cite this

Lushetich, N. (2014). The Performative Constitution of Liberal Totalitarianism on Facebook. In B. Chow, & A. Mangold (Eds.), Žižek and Performance (pp. 94-109). (Performance Philosophy). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403193_7
Lushetich, Natasha. / The Performative Constitution of Liberal Totalitarianism on Facebook. Žižek and Performance. editor / Broderick Chow ; Alex Mangold. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. pp. 94-109 (Performance Philosophy).
@inbook{f7fd16094ada454e88e669531bd8b86c,
title = "The Performative Constitution of Liberal Totalitarianism on Facebook",
abstract = "The twenty-first century is often perceived as the century of personal freedom. Unlike the economic freedom of the nineteenth century and the political freedom of the twentieth century, this particular brand of freedom is seen as no longer confined to civic realms, political or bureaucratic structures, nor, in fact, interpellative of a particular moral philosophy.1 Instead it is seen as enabling individuals to choose the very standards by which to live their life. A considerably less enthusiastic account of personal freedom and, in particular, of its relation to choice, is given by the psychologist Barry Schwartz and the philosopher Renata Salecl, authors of The Paradox of Choice and The Tyranny of Choice, respectively. For Schwartz, the widespread belief that the way to maximise individual freedom is to maximise choice is an ill-fated impasse. Not only do hundreds of brands of biscuits, broadband providers, and insurance policies have a paralysing rather than a liberating effect on the individual, they furthermore decrease rather than increase satisfaction levels, much like they increase, rather than decrease disappointment levels. The reason for this are mostly ‘opportunity costs’, the fact that the decision to follow path A invariably results in the lost opportunity to follow path B.",
author = "Natasha Lushetich",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1057/9781137403193_7",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-349-48913-8",
series = "Performance Philosophy",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
pages = "94--109",
editor = "Chow, {Broderick } and Mangold, {Alex }",
booktitle = "Žižek and Performance",

}

Lushetich, N 2014, The Performative Constitution of Liberal Totalitarianism on Facebook. in B Chow & A Mangold (eds), Žižek and Performance. Performance Philosophy, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403193_7

The Performative Constitution of Liberal Totalitarianism on Facebook. / Lushetich, Natasha.

Žižek and Performance. ed. / Broderick Chow; Alex Mangold. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. p. 94-109 (Performance Philosophy).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Performative Constitution of Liberal Totalitarianism on Facebook

AU - Lushetich, Natasha

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The twenty-first century is often perceived as the century of personal freedom. Unlike the economic freedom of the nineteenth century and the political freedom of the twentieth century, this particular brand of freedom is seen as no longer confined to civic realms, political or bureaucratic structures, nor, in fact, interpellative of a particular moral philosophy.1 Instead it is seen as enabling individuals to choose the very standards by which to live their life. A considerably less enthusiastic account of personal freedom and, in particular, of its relation to choice, is given by the psychologist Barry Schwartz and the philosopher Renata Salecl, authors of The Paradox of Choice and The Tyranny of Choice, respectively. For Schwartz, the widespread belief that the way to maximise individual freedom is to maximise choice is an ill-fated impasse. Not only do hundreds of brands of biscuits, broadband providers, and insurance policies have a paralysing rather than a liberating effect on the individual, they furthermore decrease rather than increase satisfaction levels, much like they increase, rather than decrease disappointment levels. The reason for this are mostly ‘opportunity costs’, the fact that the decision to follow path A invariably results in the lost opportunity to follow path B.

AB - The twenty-first century is often perceived as the century of personal freedom. Unlike the economic freedom of the nineteenth century and the political freedom of the twentieth century, this particular brand of freedom is seen as no longer confined to civic realms, political or bureaucratic structures, nor, in fact, interpellative of a particular moral philosophy.1 Instead it is seen as enabling individuals to choose the very standards by which to live their life. A considerably less enthusiastic account of personal freedom and, in particular, of its relation to choice, is given by the psychologist Barry Schwartz and the philosopher Renata Salecl, authors of The Paradox of Choice and The Tyranny of Choice, respectively. For Schwartz, the widespread belief that the way to maximise individual freedom is to maximise choice is an ill-fated impasse. Not only do hundreds of brands of biscuits, broadband providers, and insurance policies have a paralysing rather than a liberating effect on the individual, they furthermore decrease rather than increase satisfaction levels, much like they increase, rather than decrease disappointment levels. The reason for this are mostly ‘opportunity costs’, the fact that the decision to follow path A invariably results in the lost opportunity to follow path B.

U2 - 10.1057/9781137403193_7

DO - 10.1057/9781137403193_7

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 978-1-349-48913-8

T3 - Performance Philosophy

SP - 94

EP - 109

BT - Žižek and Performance

A2 - Chow, Broderick

A2 - Mangold, Alex

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - London

ER -

Lushetich N. The Performative Constitution of Liberal Totalitarianism on Facebook. In Chow B, Mangold A, editors, Žižek and Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2014. p. 94-109. (Performance Philosophy). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403193_7