Time for Ontology? The Role of Ontological Time in Anticipation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this contribution, I will argue for an ontological understanding of time as temporality. This, however, implies that in a certain sense being is temporality, by which I mean that i) on an ontological level temporality is nothing but the process of change, i.e. the dynamic aspect of being in its becoming, changing and perishing, and ii) that concrete beings are not merely in time, but they are temporal. This leads to the conclusion that actual time is the process of change beings are, as well as the conclusion that reality is fundamentally temporal as argued by process metaphysicians like Alfred North Whitehead, Henrí Bergson, Martin Heidegger and Gilles Deleuze.

The investigation begins with first establishing the methodological difficulties involved in thinking temporality as an ontological feature. In a second step, dynamic ontologies are introduced as the conceptual background best suited to think ontological temporality and their difference to event-ontologies is explained. Finally, the distinction between temporality and linear time is clarified. This introduction of temporality ends with some arguments for the existence of temporality that are inspired by Aristotle’s famous investigations into the nature of time. After having thus introduced temporality as an ontological feature and argued for the existence and relevance of it, its implications for our understanding of the dimensions time and especially for anticipation are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAxiomathes
Early online date29 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Anticipation
Ontology
Linear Time
Ontological
Temporality
Imply

Keywords

  • Temporal ontology
  • Process philosophy
  • Anticipation
  • Future
  • Past

Cite this

@article{9280c8b52ead48d59d01f677c7670f85,
title = "Time for Ontology? The Role of Ontological Time in Anticipation",
abstract = "In this contribution, I will argue for an ontological understanding of time as temporality. This, however, implies that in a certain sense being is temporality, by which I mean that i) on an ontological level temporality is nothing but the process of change, i.e. the dynamic aspect of being in its becoming, changing and perishing, and ii) that concrete beings are not merely in time, but they are temporal. This leads to the conclusion that actual time is the process of change beings are, as well as the conclusion that reality is fundamentally temporal as argued by process metaphysicians like Alfred North Whitehead, Henr{\'i} Bergson, Martin Heidegger and Gilles Deleuze. The investigation begins with first establishing the methodological difficulties involved in thinking temporality as an ontological feature. In a second step, dynamic ontologies are introduced as the conceptual background best suited to think ontological temporality and their difference to event-ontologies is explained. Finally, the distinction between temporality and linear time is clarified. This introduction of temporality ends with some arguments for the existence of temporality that are inspired by Aristotle’s famous investigations into the nature of time. After having thus introduced temporality as an ontological feature and argued for the existence and relevance of it, its implications for our understanding of the dimensions time and especially for anticipation are discussed.",
keywords = "Temporal ontology, Process philosophy, Anticipation, Future, Past",
author = "Tina Rock",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1007/s10516-017-9362-2",
language = "English",
journal = "Axiomathes",
issn = "1122-1151",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

Time for Ontology? The Role of Ontological Time in Anticipation. / Rock, Tina.

In: Axiomathes, 29.12.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time for Ontology? The Role of Ontological Time in Anticipation

AU - Rock, Tina

PY - 2017/12/29

Y1 - 2017/12/29

N2 - In this contribution, I will argue for an ontological understanding of time as temporality. This, however, implies that in a certain sense being is temporality, by which I mean that i) on an ontological level temporality is nothing but the process of change, i.e. the dynamic aspect of being in its becoming, changing and perishing, and ii) that concrete beings are not merely in time, but they are temporal. This leads to the conclusion that actual time is the process of change beings are, as well as the conclusion that reality is fundamentally temporal as argued by process metaphysicians like Alfred North Whitehead, Henrí Bergson, Martin Heidegger and Gilles Deleuze. The investigation begins with first establishing the methodological difficulties involved in thinking temporality as an ontological feature. In a second step, dynamic ontologies are introduced as the conceptual background best suited to think ontological temporality and their difference to event-ontologies is explained. Finally, the distinction between temporality and linear time is clarified. This introduction of temporality ends with some arguments for the existence of temporality that are inspired by Aristotle’s famous investigations into the nature of time. After having thus introduced temporality as an ontological feature and argued for the existence and relevance of it, its implications for our understanding of the dimensions time and especially for anticipation are discussed.

AB - In this contribution, I will argue for an ontological understanding of time as temporality. This, however, implies that in a certain sense being is temporality, by which I mean that i) on an ontological level temporality is nothing but the process of change, i.e. the dynamic aspect of being in its becoming, changing and perishing, and ii) that concrete beings are not merely in time, but they are temporal. This leads to the conclusion that actual time is the process of change beings are, as well as the conclusion that reality is fundamentally temporal as argued by process metaphysicians like Alfred North Whitehead, Henrí Bergson, Martin Heidegger and Gilles Deleuze. The investigation begins with first establishing the methodological difficulties involved in thinking temporality as an ontological feature. In a second step, dynamic ontologies are introduced as the conceptual background best suited to think ontological temporality and their difference to event-ontologies is explained. Finally, the distinction between temporality and linear time is clarified. This introduction of temporality ends with some arguments for the existence of temporality that are inspired by Aristotle’s famous investigations into the nature of time. After having thus introduced temporality as an ontological feature and argued for the existence and relevance of it, its implications for our understanding of the dimensions time and especially for anticipation are discussed.

KW - Temporal ontology

KW - Process philosophy

KW - Anticipation

KW - Future

KW - Past

U2 - 10.1007/s10516-017-9362-2

DO - 10.1007/s10516-017-9362-2

M3 - Article

JO - Axiomathes

JF - Axiomathes

SN - 1122-1151

ER -