Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication

Chris Reed, Doug Walton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Argumentation schemes are patterns of non-deductive reasoning that have been the focus of extended study in argumentation theory. They have also been identified in computational domains including multi-agent systems as holding the potential for significant improvements in reasoning and communication abilities. By focusing on models of natural language argumentation schemes, and then building formal systems from them, direct implementation in multi-agent environments becomes a possibility. The formal, representational and implementational details are presented here, along with results that demonstrate not only advantages of flexibility, scope, and knowledge sharing, but also of computational efficiency.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)173-188
    Number of pages16
    JournalAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
    Volume11
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2005

    Fingerprint

    Computational efficiency
    Multi agent systems
    Communication

    Keywords

    • Argumentation
    • Knowledge representation
    • Schemes

    Cite this

    @article{e6d7dece71a14fc7a337ffd90a6c15b2,
    title = "Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication",
    abstract = "Argumentation schemes are patterns of non-deductive reasoning that have been the focus of extended study in argumentation theory. They have also been identified in computational domains including multi-agent systems as holding the potential for significant improvements in reasoning and communication abilities. By focusing on models of natural language argumentation schemes, and then building formal systems from them, direct implementation in multi-agent environments becomes a possibility. The formal, representational and implementational details are presented here, along with results that demonstrate not only advantages of flexibility, scope, and knowledge sharing, but also of computational efficiency.",
    keywords = "Argumentation, Knowledge representation, Schemes",
    author = "Chris Reed and Doug Walton",
    note = "dc.publisher: Springer Verlag The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com",
    year = "2005",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1007/s10458-005-1729-x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "173--188",
    journal = "Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems",
    issn = "1387-2532",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "2",

    }

    Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication. / Reed, Chris; Walton, Doug.

    In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Vol. 11, No. 2, 09.2005, p. 173-188.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication

    AU - Reed, Chris

    AU - Walton, Doug

    N1 - dc.publisher: Springer Verlag The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com

    PY - 2005/9

    Y1 - 2005/9

    N2 - Argumentation schemes are patterns of non-deductive reasoning that have been the focus of extended study in argumentation theory. They have also been identified in computational domains including multi-agent systems as holding the potential for significant improvements in reasoning and communication abilities. By focusing on models of natural language argumentation schemes, and then building formal systems from them, direct implementation in multi-agent environments becomes a possibility. The formal, representational and implementational details are presented here, along with results that demonstrate not only advantages of flexibility, scope, and knowledge sharing, but also of computational efficiency.

    AB - Argumentation schemes are patterns of non-deductive reasoning that have been the focus of extended study in argumentation theory. They have also been identified in computational domains including multi-agent systems as holding the potential for significant improvements in reasoning and communication abilities. By focusing on models of natural language argumentation schemes, and then building formal systems from them, direct implementation in multi-agent environments becomes a possibility. The formal, representational and implementational details are presented here, along with results that demonstrate not only advantages of flexibility, scope, and knowledge sharing, but also of computational efficiency.

    KW - Argumentation

    KW - Knowledge representation

    KW - Schemes

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24144432342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s10458-005-1729-x

    DO - 10.1007/s10458-005-1729-x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 11

    SP - 173

    EP - 188

    JO - Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

    JF - Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

    SN - 1387-2532

    IS - 2

    ER -