Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework

Andy M. Wearn, Charlotte E. Rees, Paul Bradley, Anna K. Vnuk

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Context: Peer physical examination (PPE) has been employed for several decades as part of the formal curriculum for learning clinical skills. Most of the existing studies exploring students' attitudes towards PPE are single-site and use quantitative methods. Currently, there is a lack of theoretical underpinning to PPE as a learning method. Methods: Using an adaptation of the Examining Fellow Students questionnaire, we captured qualitative data from Year 1 medical students about their views and concerns around learning using PPE. The study was set in six schools across five countries (the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Hong Kong). Students provided free text comments that were later transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. Results: A total of 617 students provided comments for analysis. This paper focuses on several related themes about the complexities of students' relationships within the context of PPE and their reflections on peer examination in comparison with genuine patient examination. Students drew parallels and differences between the peer examiner-examinee relationship and the doctor-patient relationship. They explained how these two types of relationship differed in nature and in terms of their levels of interaction. Discussion: Our findings illuminate the interactional and complex nature of PPE, drawing out concerns and ambiguities around relationships, community and rules. We discuss our results in light of Engeström's model of activity theory (AT) and provide recommendations for educational practice and further research based on the principles of AT.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1218-1226
    Number of pages9
    JournalMedical Education
    Volume42
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2008

    Fingerprint

    Physical Examination
    Students
    Learning
    Clinical Competence
    Hong Kong
    Medical Students
    New Zealand
    Curriculum
    Japan
    Research

    Cite this

    Wearn, Andy M. ; Rees, Charlotte E. ; Bradley, Paul ; Vnuk, Anna K. / Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework. In: Medical Education. 2008 ; Vol. 42, No. 12. pp. 1218-1226.
    @article{dd654dd7c1ba4eab9204e7c3a3765ff6,
    title = "Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework",
    abstract = "Context: Peer physical examination (PPE) has been employed for several decades as part of the formal curriculum for learning clinical skills. Most of the existing studies exploring students' attitudes towards PPE are single-site and use quantitative methods. Currently, there is a lack of theoretical underpinning to PPE as a learning method. Methods: Using an adaptation of the Examining Fellow Students questionnaire, we captured qualitative data from Year 1 medical students about their views and concerns around learning using PPE. The study was set in six schools across five countries (the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Hong Kong). Students provided free text comments that were later transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. Results: A total of 617 students provided comments for analysis. This paper focuses on several related themes about the complexities of students' relationships within the context of PPE and their reflections on peer examination in comparison with genuine patient examination. Students drew parallels and differences between the peer examiner-examinee relationship and the doctor-patient relationship. They explained how these two types of relationship differed in nature and in terms of their levels of interaction. Discussion: Our findings illuminate the interactional and complex nature of PPE, drawing out concerns and ambiguities around relationships, community and rules. We discuss our results in light of Engestr{\"o}m's model of activity theory (AT) and provide recommendations for educational practice and further research based on the principles of AT.",
    author = "Wearn, {Andy M.} and Rees, {Charlotte E.} and Paul Bradley and Vnuk, {Anna K.}",
    note = "MEDLINE{\circledR} is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.",
    year = "2008",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03175.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "42",
    pages = "1218--1226",
    journal = "Medical Education",
    issn = "0308-0110",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "12",

    }

    Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework. / Wearn, Andy M.; Rees, Charlotte E.; Bradley, Paul ; Vnuk, Anna K.

    In: Medical Education, Vol. 42, No. 12, 01.12.2008, p. 1218-1226.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework

    AU - Wearn, Andy M.

    AU - Rees, Charlotte E.

    AU - Bradley, Paul

    AU - Vnuk, Anna K.

    N1 - MEDLINE® is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.

    PY - 2008/12/1

    Y1 - 2008/12/1

    N2 - Context: Peer physical examination (PPE) has been employed for several decades as part of the formal curriculum for learning clinical skills. Most of the existing studies exploring students' attitudes towards PPE are single-site and use quantitative methods. Currently, there is a lack of theoretical underpinning to PPE as a learning method. Methods: Using an adaptation of the Examining Fellow Students questionnaire, we captured qualitative data from Year 1 medical students about their views and concerns around learning using PPE. The study was set in six schools across five countries (the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Hong Kong). Students provided free text comments that were later transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. Results: A total of 617 students provided comments for analysis. This paper focuses on several related themes about the complexities of students' relationships within the context of PPE and their reflections on peer examination in comparison with genuine patient examination. Students drew parallels and differences between the peer examiner-examinee relationship and the doctor-patient relationship. They explained how these two types of relationship differed in nature and in terms of their levels of interaction. Discussion: Our findings illuminate the interactional and complex nature of PPE, drawing out concerns and ambiguities around relationships, community and rules. We discuss our results in light of Engeström's model of activity theory (AT) and provide recommendations for educational practice and further research based on the principles of AT.

    AB - Context: Peer physical examination (PPE) has been employed for several decades as part of the formal curriculum for learning clinical skills. Most of the existing studies exploring students' attitudes towards PPE are single-site and use quantitative methods. Currently, there is a lack of theoretical underpinning to PPE as a learning method. Methods: Using an adaptation of the Examining Fellow Students questionnaire, we captured qualitative data from Year 1 medical students about their views and concerns around learning using PPE. The study was set in six schools across five countries (the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Hong Kong). Students provided free text comments that were later transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. Results: A total of 617 students provided comments for analysis. This paper focuses on several related themes about the complexities of students' relationships within the context of PPE and their reflections on peer examination in comparison with genuine patient examination. Students drew parallels and differences between the peer examiner-examinee relationship and the doctor-patient relationship. They explained how these two types of relationship differed in nature and in terms of their levels of interaction. Discussion: Our findings illuminate the interactional and complex nature of PPE, drawing out concerns and ambiguities around relationships, community and rules. We discuss our results in light of Engeström's model of activity theory (AT) and provide recommendations for educational practice and further research based on the principles of AT.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56649098812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03175.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03175.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 42

    SP - 1218

    EP - 1226

    JO - Medical Education

    JF - Medical Education

    SN - 0308-0110

    IS - 12

    ER -