Verbalization and problem solving: Insight and spatial factors

K. J. Gilhooly, E. Fioratou, N. Henretty

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Two groups of participants attempted eight examples of each of four different problem types formed by combining insight versus non-insight and verbal versus spatial factors. The groups were given different verbalization instructions viz., Silent (N = 40) or Direct Concurrent (N = 40). There were significant differences between insight and non-insight tasks and between spatial and verbal tasks in terms of solution rates and latencies. Significant interactions between the verbal versus spatial factor and verbalization condition on solution rates and latencies reflected a greater ( negative) effect of verbalizing on spatial as against verbal problems. However, no significant interactions of the insight versus non-insight factor with verbalization condition on solution rates or latencies were found. These results favoured the 'business as usual' view of insight problem solving as against the 'special process' view which predicted larger effects of verbalization for insight problems as against non-insight problems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)81-93
    Number of pages13
    JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
    Volume101
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

    Keywords

    • 9-DOT
    • DYNAMICS
    • KNOWLEDGE

    Cite this

    Gilhooly, K. J. ; Fioratou, E. ; Henretty, N. / Verbalization and problem solving : Insight and spatial factors. In: British Journal of Psychology. 2010 ; Vol. 101, No. 1. pp. 81-93.
    @article{dd75008b4a8144a5a6b5308a1581066c,
    title = "Verbalization and problem solving: Insight and spatial factors",
    abstract = "Two groups of participants attempted eight examples of each of four different problem types formed by combining insight versus non-insight and verbal versus spatial factors. The groups were given different verbalization instructions viz., Silent (N = 40) or Direct Concurrent (N = 40). There were significant differences between insight and non-insight tasks and between spatial and verbal tasks in terms of solution rates and latencies. Significant interactions between the verbal versus spatial factor and verbalization condition on solution rates and latencies reflected a greater ( negative) effect of verbalizing on spatial as against verbal problems. However, no significant interactions of the insight versus non-insight factor with verbalization condition on solution rates or latencies were found. These results favoured the 'business as usual' view of insight problem solving as against the 'special process' view which predicted larger effects of verbalization for insight problems as against non-insight problems.",
    keywords = "9-DOT, DYNAMICS, KNOWLEDGE",
    author = "Gilhooly, {K. J.} and E. Fioratou and N. Henretty",
    year = "2010",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1348/000712609X422656",
    language = "English",
    volume = "101",
    pages = "81--93",
    journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
    issn = "0007-1269",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "1",

    }

    Verbalization and problem solving : Insight and spatial factors. / Gilhooly, K. J.; Fioratou, E.; Henretty, N.

    In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 101, No. 1, 02.2010, p. 81-93.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Verbalization and problem solving

    T2 - Insight and spatial factors

    AU - Gilhooly, K. J.

    AU - Fioratou, E.

    AU - Henretty, N.

    PY - 2010/2

    Y1 - 2010/2

    N2 - Two groups of participants attempted eight examples of each of four different problem types formed by combining insight versus non-insight and verbal versus spatial factors. The groups were given different verbalization instructions viz., Silent (N = 40) or Direct Concurrent (N = 40). There were significant differences between insight and non-insight tasks and between spatial and verbal tasks in terms of solution rates and latencies. Significant interactions between the verbal versus spatial factor and verbalization condition on solution rates and latencies reflected a greater ( negative) effect of verbalizing on spatial as against verbal problems. However, no significant interactions of the insight versus non-insight factor with verbalization condition on solution rates or latencies were found. These results favoured the 'business as usual' view of insight problem solving as against the 'special process' view which predicted larger effects of verbalization for insight problems as against non-insight problems.

    AB - Two groups of participants attempted eight examples of each of four different problem types formed by combining insight versus non-insight and verbal versus spatial factors. The groups were given different verbalization instructions viz., Silent (N = 40) or Direct Concurrent (N = 40). There were significant differences between insight and non-insight tasks and between spatial and verbal tasks in terms of solution rates and latencies. Significant interactions between the verbal versus spatial factor and verbalization condition on solution rates and latencies reflected a greater ( negative) effect of verbalizing on spatial as against verbal problems. However, no significant interactions of the insight versus non-insight factor with verbalization condition on solution rates or latencies were found. These results favoured the 'business as usual' view of insight problem solving as against the 'special process' view which predicted larger effects of verbalization for insight problems as against non-insight problems.

    KW - 9-DOT

    KW - DYNAMICS

    KW - KNOWLEDGE

    U2 - 10.1348/000712609X422656

    DO - 10.1348/000712609X422656

    M3 - Article

    VL - 101

    SP - 81

    EP - 93

    JO - British Journal of Psychology

    JF - British Journal of Psychology

    SN - 0007-1269

    IS - 1

    ER -